length/width/height (mm) 4430/1770/1340, fuel consumption (l/100Km) 90km/h equal speed-7, compared with the whole body IN COMPARING, THE OPENING OF THE TRUNK IS NARROW AND FAR-ROUND. THE WIDTH OF THE TRUNK OPENING IN THE ACTUAL MEASUREMENT IS 807MM, AND THE HEIGHT FROM THE GROUND IS 800MM.
Body size: length u002F width u002F height (mm) 4430u002F1770u002F1340 fuel consumption (lu002F100Km) 90kmu002Fh equal speed-u003E7 compared with the whole body, the trunk opening In the narrow and far-reaching actual measurement, the width of the trunk opening is 807MM and the height of the ground is 800MM.
Good. Body design. Mazda rx7 adopts a lightweight aluminum body and composite material, which greatly reduces the weight of the body, thus reducing fuel consumption. Efficient engine technology. Mazda rx7 engine adopts rotary engine technology and has an efficient combustion and exhaust system, thus improving fuel utilization.
The most fuel-efficientIt is Suzuki Fengrui's 16 CVT and Ford Wingbo's 10T MT. The comprehensive fuel consumption of these two should be within 7. Other fuel consumption such as Peugeot 2008 and Hyundai ix25 can also be used by myself. The actual driving experience is very good. I recommend it first.
The fuel consumption of 100 kilometers is generally 13 ~ 15L. Fuel consumption per 100 kilometers refers to the fuel consumption of 100 kilometers when a vehicle travels at a certain speed on the highway. It is a theoretical indicator of the vehicle.
1. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotor engine does not have a high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the operation of the engine, the fuel will burn insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car. Due to the internal design problems of the rotor engine, the internal structure of the rotor engine is quite complex.
2. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotary engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the working process of the engine, the fuel burns insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car.
3. The fuel consumption of the rotor engine is relatively high.Reason: Because the rotor engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, the engine will have insufficient combustion of fuel in the combustion chamber during the working process, which is easy to lead to an increase in the fuel consumption of the car. The following is an introduction to the rotor engine: Disadvantages: high fuel consumption and heavy pollution.
4. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotor engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, when the engine is working, the combustion chamber will have insufficient fuel combustion, which is easy to affect the fuel consumption of the vehicle.
1. There are only 3 rotor engines. Mazda has a sports car with a dual-rotor engine with a displacement of 6, a horsepower of up to 500 horsepower, and a slightly higher fuel consumption of about 15 to 20.
2. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotor engine does not have a high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the operation of the engine, the fuel will burn insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car. Due to the internal design problems of the rotor engine, the internal structure of the rotor engine is quite complex.
3. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotary engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the working process of the engine, the fuel burns insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car.
Hearthstone Arena win rate-APP, download it now, new users will receive a novice gift pack.
length/width/height (mm) 4430/1770/1340, fuel consumption (l/100Km) 90km/h equal speed-7, compared with the whole body IN COMPARING, THE OPENING OF THE TRUNK IS NARROW AND FAR-ROUND. THE WIDTH OF THE TRUNK OPENING IN THE ACTUAL MEASUREMENT IS 807MM, AND THE HEIGHT FROM THE GROUND IS 800MM.
Body size: length u002F width u002F height (mm) 4430u002F1770u002F1340 fuel consumption (lu002F100Km) 90kmu002Fh equal speed-u003E7 compared with the whole body, the trunk opening In the narrow and far-reaching actual measurement, the width of the trunk opening is 807MM and the height of the ground is 800MM.
Good. Body design. Mazda rx7 adopts a lightweight aluminum body and composite material, which greatly reduces the weight of the body, thus reducing fuel consumption. Efficient engine technology. Mazda rx7 engine adopts rotary engine technology and has an efficient combustion and exhaust system, thus improving fuel utilization.
The most fuel-efficientIt is Suzuki Fengrui's 16 CVT and Ford Wingbo's 10T MT. The comprehensive fuel consumption of these two should be within 7. Other fuel consumption such as Peugeot 2008 and Hyundai ix25 can also be used by myself. The actual driving experience is very good. I recommend it first.
The fuel consumption of 100 kilometers is generally 13 ~ 15L. Fuel consumption per 100 kilometers refers to the fuel consumption of 100 kilometers when a vehicle travels at a certain speed on the highway. It is a theoretical indicator of the vehicle.
1. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotor engine does not have a high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the operation of the engine, the fuel will burn insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car. Due to the internal design problems of the rotor engine, the internal structure of the rotor engine is quite complex.
2. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotary engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the working process of the engine, the fuel burns insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car.
3. The fuel consumption of the rotor engine is relatively high.Reason: Because the rotor engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, the engine will have insufficient combustion of fuel in the combustion chamber during the working process, which is easy to lead to an increase in the fuel consumption of the car. The following is an introduction to the rotor engine: Disadvantages: high fuel consumption and heavy pollution.
4. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotor engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, when the engine is working, the combustion chamber will have insufficient fuel combustion, which is easy to affect the fuel consumption of the vehicle.
1. There are only 3 rotor engines. Mazda has a sports car with a dual-rotor engine with a displacement of 6, a horsepower of up to 500 horsepower, and a slightly higher fuel consumption of about 15 to 20.
2. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotor engine does not have a high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the operation of the engine, the fuel will burn insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car. Due to the internal design problems of the rotor engine, the internal structure of the rotor engine is quite complex.
3. The fuel consumption of the rotor is relatively high. Because the rotary engine does not have the high compression ratio of the reciprocating engine, during the working process of the engine, the fuel burns insufficiently in the combustion chamber, which is easy to increase the fuel consumption of the car.
267.27MB
Check433.82MB
Check834.26MB
Check466.17MB
Check754.89MB
Check845.94MB
Check936.36MB
Check543.68MB
Check286.82MB
Check411.22MB
Check526.21MB
Check234.17MB
Check168.42MB
Check938.23MB
Check978.53MB
Check346.83MB
Check264.19MB
Check579.46MB
Check577.69MB
Check642.64MB
Check278.55MB
Check968.41MB
Check163.82MB
Check658.17MB
Check645.55MB
Check718.27MB
Check926.43MB
Check125.76MB
Check171.33MB
Check633.38MB
Check914.21MB
Check284.22MB
Check432.97MB
Check171.28MB
Check128.25MB
Check977.81MB
CheckScan to install
Hearthstone Arena win rate to discover more
Netizen comments More
861 Arena plus APK
2025-02-24 00:36 recommend
1386 UEFA Europa League
2025-02-24 00:15 recommend
1295 TNT Sports
2025-02-24 00:06 recommend
1434 Casino Plus GCash login
2025-02-23 23:10 recommend
1990 UEFA Champions League live streaming app
2025-02-23 22:43 recommend